Salvation is just a family affair

By sheila | Apr 27, 2006

David Myatt is certainly no stranger to ideologies, having been active in the neo-Nazi camp and also founding the hardline British National Socialist Movement (BNS). In 1998, all that changed when he walked into a British mosque and announced his conversion to Islam.

David Myatt’s discovery of Islam is vividly portrayed in an Internet article he wrote for the Saved Sect website. His association with the Saved Sect speaks volumes on the stream of Islam he is partial to.

The Saved Sect, more formally known as the Savior Sect, receives its name from the famous hadith (tradition):

My nation will be divided into 73 sects, all of them will be in the Fire except for one (the saved sect)…
Like most other Salafist flavors that derive the idea of a saved sect (al-Firqat un-Naajiyah) from the hadith, the Saved Sect merely claims to represent the views of the saved sect without claiming that they themselves are saved.

Though it is disputed by some, the Saved Sect is widely alleged to be an offshoot of al-Muhajiroun, which was set up by Omar Bakri Muhammad as a front outfit for Hizb ut-Tahrir in Saudi Arabia. Al-Muhajiroun broke away from Hizb ut-Tahrir in 1996 and was officially disbanded in 2004.

Tariq Ramadan (Western Muslims and the Future of Islam) calls Hizb ut-Tahrir a Salafist-Reformist group, with clear political aims to re-establish an Islamic caliphate. The Saved Sect- along with its now defunct affiliate, al-Muhajiroun- do not detract much from this aim. Like most Salafist flavors, the Saved Sect shoulders the burden of establishing dawah (evangelism) to remind Muslims- most of whom they deem to be on the brink of apostasy- about their duties.

Their manifesto also includes:

1. Labeling popular scholars such as Sheikh Hamza Yusuf and Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi as apostates. Not even Saudi-Salafists like Sheikh ibn Baaz or Sheikh ibn Uthaymeen are spared.

2. Positively identifying the Saudi kingdom as the personification of the ancient cult of secessionists known as Khawaarij (seceders). [see khawaarij]

  1. Condemning the practice of taqleed (adherence to a School of Thought) that is widespread amongst Muslims to be a "road to deviation, misguidance, superstition and all other forms of falsehood".  [see taqleed]

  2. Labeling Sufism as a deviant sect. [see bid'ah]

Such lists are hardly novel, since ideologies don’t ordinarily tolerate one another. The Saved Sect’s criticism of popular Saudi sheikhs, for example, ensures hostility from a tireless and well-endowed quarter; that of Saudi Salafism. However, to extend the point about general ideological intolerance, Saudi Salafism does share a common enemy with the Saved Sect. Both groups detest Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi and many conservative Salafists label him as the Wicked Mufti. A Mufti, of course, is an Islamic scholar who is qualified to issue religious edicts called fatwas. Combined with the appellation, wicked, it denotes a person who perhaps issues heretical fatwas.

Sheikh al-Qaradawi’s brand of deviation, at least according to this article, is called Qaradawism. It’s rather unimaginative, but Olivier Roy (Globalised Islam) describes such exercises as entirely typical of ideological groups in Islam.
…[they] tend to have the same habit as did the Soviets, labeling a ‘deviation’ with the name of the thinker (Suroorism, Qaradawism, Qutbism).

Aside from having a whole movement named after him, Sheikh al-Qaradawi is also the target of any number of threats. They range from relatively harmless name-calling, like being dubbed a "barking dog" by no less a personage than Sheikh Muqbil ibn Haadee al-Waadi’ee, to out-and-out appeals for his execution. In this, Sheikh Abu Basser at-Tartousi, a man who explicitly styles himself a Wahhabi [1] and christens the Saudi regime as a kafir (Islam-rejecting) establishment, quotes a verdict by Saudi Sheikh ibn Uthaymeen [2],

…if he [al-Qaradawi] doesn’t repent, he is to be killed as an apostate.

The Saved Sect, however, carefully maintains that it does not,

…advocate any type of violence towards any particular nation.
Yet, ironically enough, in an article entitled "How Islam will dominate the world", the group recommends several ways in which a state or country can become Daar ul-Islam (the domain of Islam). One of them states that Muslims should,
…rise, overthrow the government and implement the Sharee’ah by force…

[1] The original declaration is found in a now-defunct website (www.tibyan.com) whose cached page I have screen-captured for posterity.

[2] His teacher was Sheikh ibn Baaz, Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia and one of those who had been educated by a teacher from the family of Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab.
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • MisterWong
  • BlinkList
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Technorati
  • blogmarks
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • RSS
  • Simpy

You should check out these posts:

4 Comments so far
  1. Irving Karchmar April 27, 2006 10:13 am

    Salaam Alaikum:
    An excellent blog :) As a thoughtful writer, may I commend to you my book, Master of the Jinn: A Sufi Novel, a mystical adventure tale on the Sufi path of Love. I think you’ll like it.
    You can view the book and read an excerpt at http://www.masterofthejinn.com
    In the Name of the Most Merciful, 10% of all profits go to charity.

    Ya Haqq,

    Irving

  2. Danya April 29, 2006 10:46 am

    ahahahahahahaha

    *falls off chair*

  3. dezhen April 30, 2006 1:49 pm

    These guys are incredibly scary people. The area I was at University in the UK had a few of the supporters of this group back when it was al-Muhajiroun.

    The interesting thing for me, as a convert, is seeing which “type” of Islam different people convert to. I think a lot has to do with their underlying character, and this influences their reasons. For me, it was the universal ethics/moral teaching, as well as the well-refined legal process which appealed to my heart. I do know that others convert because of the wholesale rejection of “the West” and suchlike, however. Which is rather scary.

    Interesting article nontheless!

  4. dezhen March 9, 2009 7:50 pm

    These guys are incredibly scary people. The area I was at University in the UK had a few of the supporters of this group back when it was al-Muhajiroun.

    The interesting thing for me, as a convert, is seeing which “type” of Islam different people convert to. I think a lot has to do with their underlying character, and this influences their reasons. For me, it was the universal ethics/moral teaching, as well as the well-refined legal process which appealed to my heart. I do know that others convert because of the wholesale rejection of “the West” and suchlike, however. Which is rather scary.

    Interesting article nontheless!

Leave a Comment

If you would like to make a comment, please fill out the form below.

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Comments

Disclaimer | Terms of Use