<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Islam, Fundamentalism, and the Betrayal of Tradition (Joseph E Lumbard)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://higher-criticism.com/2006/04/islam-fundamentalism-and-betrayal-of.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://higher-criticism.com/2006/04/islam-fundamentalism-and-betrayal-of.html</link>
	<description>...exposing the evils and deviancy of modern-day extremist movements that operate under the guise of religion...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:57:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Goldi</title>
		<link>http://higher-criticism.com/2006/04/islam-fundamentalism-and-betrayal-of.html/comment-page-1#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Goldi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.147.242.95/~deendotc/addondomains/highercriticism/?p=111#comment-633</guid>
		<description>here&#039;s a trend you&#039;ll notice with any zealous wahhabi/salafi/jihadi.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They&#039;re poorly read, get most of their information off a website or were &#039;changed&#039; after reading a book by author x and have never looked back.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is like taking a &#039;fox-news&#039; approach to religion. Very &#039;red-state&#039;.&lt;/br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here&#39;s a trend you&#39;ll notice with any zealous wahhabi/salafi/jihadi.<br /><br />They&#39;re poorly read, get most of their information off a website or were &#39;changed&#39; after reading a book by author x and have never looked back.<br /><br />This is like taking a &#39;fox-news&#39; approach to religion. Very &#39;red-state&#39;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goldi</title>
		<link>http://higher-criticism.com/2006/04/islam-fundamentalism-and-betrayal-of.html/comment-page-1#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Goldi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 07:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.147.242.95/~deendotc/addondomains/highercriticism/?p=111#comment-122</guid>
		<description>here&#039;s a trend you&#039;ll notice with any zealous wahhabi/salafi/jihadi.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;They&#039;re poorly read, get most of their information off a website or were &#039;changed&#039; after reading a book by author x and have never looked back.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This is like taking a &#039;fox-news&#039; approach to religion. Very &#039;red-state&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here&#8217;s a trend you&#8217;ll notice with any zealous wahhabi/salafi/jihadi.<br /><br />They&#8217;re poorly read, get most of their information off a website or were &#8216;changed&#8217; after reading a book by author x and have never looked back.<br /><br />This is like taking a &#8216;fox-news&#8217; approach to religion. Very &#8216;red-state&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheilaX</title>
		<link>http://higher-criticism.com/2006/04/islam-fundamentalism-and-betrayal-of.html/comment-page-1#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>sheilaX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 02:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.147.242.95/~deendotc/addondomains/highercriticism/?p=111#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Hehe, thanks for clarifying.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You have my sincere blessings to cross-post, brother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe, thanks for clarifying.<br /><br />You have my sincere blessings to cross-post, brother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jc</title>
		<link>http://higher-criticism.com/2006/04/islam-fundamentalism-and-betrayal-of.html/comment-page-1#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>jc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 02:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.147.242.95/~deendotc/addondomains/highercriticism/?p=111#comment-119</guid>
		<description>by crosspost i meant &quot;copying the first paragraph and linking to the remainder.&quot; &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;i find it very well written and thought i&#039;d plug it.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;thank you.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;jc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by crosspost i meant &#8220;copying the first paragraph and linking to the remainder.&#8221; <br /><br />i find it very well written and thought i&#8217;d plug it.<br /><br />thank you.<br /><br />jc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheilaX</title>
		<link>http://higher-criticism.com/2006/04/islam-fundamentalism-and-betrayal-of.html/comment-page-1#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>sheilaX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.147.242.95/~deendotc/addondomains/highercriticism/?p=111#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Shalom,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don&#039;t exactly know what you mean by &quot;cross-post&quot;, but if you want to use a part of my article in your own blog, please go ahead. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If you need some clarification, do email me at:&lt;br/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;higher.criticism@gmail.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shalom,<br /><br />I don&#8217;t exactly know what you mean by &#8220;cross-post&#8221;, but if you want to use a part of my article in your own blog, please go ahead. <br /><br />If you need some clarification, do email me at:<br /> <br /><a href="mailto:higher.criticism@gmail.com">higher.criticism@gmail.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jc</title>
		<link>http://higher-criticism.com/2006/04/islam-fundamentalism-and-betrayal-of.html/comment-page-1#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>jc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 01:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.147.242.95/~deendotc/addondomains/highercriticism/?p=111#comment-117</guid>
		<description>hi,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;mind if i cross post the first paragraph?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;jc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,<br /><br />mind if i cross post the first paragraph?<br /><br />jc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asem Bakhshi</title>
		<link>http://higher-criticism.com/2006/04/islam-fundamentalism-and-betrayal-of.html/comment-page-1#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Asem Bakhshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 07:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.147.242.95/~deendotc/addondomains/highercriticism/?p=111#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Radical theme, as I view it, takes an overall approach towards Islam as &lt;br/&gt;&#039;Ought&#039; or &#039;Ought Not&#039;. Therefore whatever is on the fringes of this &lt;br/&gt;construct is seen as an &#039;innovation&#039; or &#039;unislamic&#039;. Thats a beautifully &lt;br/&gt;simple theme but negates the inherent dynamism of Islam. Salaf actually &lt;br/&gt;understood in early formative phase of Islam that they have to &lt;br/&gt;institutionalise their differences of opinion in order to save the greater &lt;br/&gt;unity of Ummah. What is destroying this institutionalised difference of &lt;br/&gt;opinion may not be the radical struggle alone but traditionalism is to be &lt;br/&gt;blamed equally. Modern man does not always raise questions in order to &lt;br/&gt;modify his action which is different then a pre-modern man. I believe that &lt;br/&gt;traditional Islam has to do a lot in order to show the need for that &lt;br/&gt;institutionalised difference of opinion to the world and radicalists as &lt;br/&gt;well. A revival of &#039;ilm al ikhtalaf&#039; you can call it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radical theme, as I view it, takes an overall approach towards Islam as <br />&#8216;Ought&#8217; or &#8216;Ought Not&#8217;. Therefore whatever is on the fringes of this <br />construct is seen as an &#8216;innovation&#8217; or &#8216;unislamic&#8217;. Thats a beautifully <br />simple theme but negates the inherent dynamism of Islam. Salaf actually <br />understood in early formative phase of Islam that they have to <br />institutionalise their differences of opinion in order to save the greater <br />unity of Ummah. What is destroying this institutionalised difference of <br />opinion may not be the radical struggle alone but traditionalism is to be <br />blamed equally. Modern man does not always raise questions in order to <br />modify his action which is different then a pre-modern man. I believe that <br />traditional Islam has to do a lot in order to show the need for that <br />institutionalised difference of opinion to the world and radicalists as <br />well. A revival of &#8216;ilm al ikhtalaf&#8217; you can call it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
